> Transmissionhttp://www.transmissionbt.com/images/screenshots/Qt-Large.jpg
> и проч
LXQT
http://blog.lxde.org/?p=990
> I, however, need to admit that working with Qt/C++ is much more pleasant and productive than messing with C/GObject/GTK+.
> Since GTK+ 3 breaks backward compatibility a lot and it becomes more memory hungry and slower, I don’t
> see much advantage of GTK+ now. GTK+ 2 is lighter, but it’s no longer true for GTK+ 3. Ironically, fixing all
> of the broken compatibility is even harder than porting to Qt in some cases (PCManFM IMO is one of them).
https://www.opennet.dev/opennews/art.shtml?num=43377
> Выпуск сетевого анализатора Wireshark 2.0, перешедшего на Qt
https://www.opennet.dev/opennews/art.shtml?num=40067
> OpenNews: Audacious возвращается на GTK2, в перспективе переход на Qt
https://www.opennet.dev/opennews/art.shtml?num=41241
>OpenNews: Альфа-выпуск Audacious 3.6 ознаменовал возвращение с GTK3 на GTK2 и появление интерфейса на основе Qt
https://liveblue.wordpress.com/2013/12/16/subsurface-4-0-has.../
> With version 4.0 we switched to Qt as our UI toolki