OpenForum RSS: nmap vs ping

nmap vs ping (pauliceman)

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 21:15:17 GMT

>>nmap -sP -e re0 -max-rate 5 192.168.1.11
> Starting Nmap 5.36TEST4 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-01-26 23:18 EET
> sendto in send_ip_packet_sd: sendto(4, packet, 40, 0, 192.168.1.11, 16) => Host is
> down
> Offending packet: TCP 192.168.1.1:61981 > 192.168.1.11:80 A ttl=48 id=13069 iplen=10240
> seq=0 win=1024
> Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying
> � �.�.....

�� , - �� --send-eth �� .

nmap vs ping (pauliceman)

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:54:12 GMT

�� nmap-� �� .
�� "��". �� (��, �� 192.168.1.1, �� 192.168.1.0/24 �� , � �� , ��, 192.168.10.0/24 - �� ). ��, �� icmp-�� 192.168.1.1 �� 192.168.1.11:
>nmap -sP -e re0 -max-rate 5 192.168.1.11

Starting Nmap 5.36TEST4 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2011-01-26 23:18 EET
sendto in send_ip_packet_sd: sendto(4, packet, 40, 0, 192.168.1.11, 16) => Host is down
Offending packet: TCP 192.168.1.1:61981 > 192.168.1.11:80 A ttl=48 id=13069 iplen=10240 seq=0 win=1024
Sleeping 15 seconds then retrying

� �.�.....

�� , �� "offending packet........" ��.

nmap vs ping (ronin)

Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:34:06 GMT

nmap �� , �� ݣ �� timestamp � �� ICMP. �� ICMP timestamp �� , �� nmap � ��.

respect,
ronin

>[�� ]
> ��-�� : nmap -sP 192.168.0.0/24. �� 0 �� ,
> �� .
> �� nmap �� :
> nmap -sP 192.168.0.1.
> � � ��:
> Note: Host seems down. If it is really up, but blocking our
> ping probes, try -Pn
> Nmap done: 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 3.03 seconds.
> �� -�� ....
> �� ?